Financial services & compliance

Cutting audit preparation time by 60% for a Fortune 500 financial institution

A Fortune 500 financial institution replaced spreadsheet-based regulatory reconciliation with an automated, auditable control layer across 25+ systems — reducing audit preparation time by 60% and accelerating reporting cycles by 40%.

60%
Less time spent on audit preparation
40%
Faster reporting cycles
25+
Systems brought into one control layer

The challenge

Regulatory reporting depended on a patchwork of extracts, spreadsheets, and manual checks spread across more than two dozen systems. Every reporting cycle required specialists to reconcile balances by hand, investigate breaks, and rebuild evidence for auditors.

The process was accurate enough to pass, but it was slow, expensive, and fragile. A single late extract could delay a filing, and audit preparation consumed weeks of senior analyst time each year.

The approach

1. Map every report to its sources

The team built a source-to-report inventory so each regulatory figure had an owner, a system of record, and a documented transformation path.

2. Automate reconciliation, not just extraction

4DAlert connectors pulled balances from core banking, general ledger, and downstream reporting systems. Reconciliation rules replaced the manual tie-outs, with exceptions routed to the right analyst.

3. Make evidence continuous

Every reconciliation run produced a timestamped audit trail, so audit preparation became a review of existing evidence rather than a reconstruction exercise.

4. Add controls before go-live

Thresholds, escalation paths, and sign-off gates were configured with the controllership team, keeping the automation inside the institution's existing risk framework.

The results

Audit preparation time fell by 60% and reporting cycles accelerated by 40%. More importantly, the institution gained a repeatable control layer: new reports can reuse the same connectors, rules, and evidence model instead of starting from another spreadsheet.

  • 25+ systems reconciled through a single platform
  • Exceptions routed to named owners with a full audit trail
  • Audit evidence generated as part of every run
The client's identity is withheld under NDA. Metrics reflect the engagement as reported by the client's finance and controls team.

What made it work

Three decisions mattered most: treating reconciliation as a control rather than a report, agreeing exception ownership before automation, and keeping the audit trail in the platform instead of in email. Each one reduced the amount of manual work that survived the project.

Related reading

More customer results: Manufacturing data reconciliation → Healthcare DataOps automation →

Discuss a similar program

We will walk through your systems, the controls you need, and what a first production release would look like.